<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Geometrical-Optics on Dr. Simon Bance</title>
    <link>https://academic.bancey.com/tags/geometrical-optics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Geometrical-Optics on Dr. Simon Bance</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://academic.bancey.com/tags/geometrical-optics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Deriving Snell&#39;s Law Using Fermat&#39;s Principle and the Method of Substitution</title>
      <link>https://academic.bancey.com/posts/deriving-snells-law-fermat-principle-substitution/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://academic.bancey.com/posts/deriving-snells-law-fermat-principle-substitution/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;deriving-snells-law&#34;&gt;Deriving Snell&amp;rsquo;s Law&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most elegant results in optics is &lt;strong&gt;Snell&amp;rsquo;s Law&lt;/strong&gt;, which relates the angles of incidence and refraction at the boundary between two media:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$$
n_1 \sin\theta_1 = n_2 \sin\theta_2.
$$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many textbooks derive this result using constrained optimization and Lagrange multipliers. However, there is a simpler and more intuitive approach: eliminate the constraint through substitution and reduce the problem to an ordinary single-variable minimization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This derivation follows directly from &lt;strong&gt;Fermat&amp;rsquo;s Principle&lt;/strong&gt;, which states that light follows a path for which the optical path length is stationary (typically a minimum).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
